javascript hit counter
Cobble Hill Blog » Union Hall Liquor License Debate Proves That Park Slope is for Wussies

Site menu:

Site search

Blogads


blog advertising is good for you

Archives

Categories

Links:

CHB Staff

Publisher
Homer Fink
Contributors
EJ
Tattoo Artist
Adam Suerte
CTO
Qfwfq
Contributors welcome:
homer AT cobblehillblog.com

Show Your Face on CHB

Sign up for gravatars and your avatar will appear next to your CHB comment!

Keep CHB Going!

Cobble Hill Blog needs you! If you'd like to volunteer and contribute your writing, photos or news tips, please

My Weather

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

CHB Photo Pool

www.flickr.com
items in Cobble Hill Blog Photo Pool More in Cobble Hill Blog Photo Pool pool

Meta

Union Hall Liquor License Debate Proves That Park Slope is for Wussies

CB6 met last night and spent most of their time listening to whiners whine about what a nuissance Union Hall is to them. This only proves one thing to folks in Cobble Hill — Park Slope is full of wussies. But rather than deport these knuckleheads back from whence they came — NOT BROOKLYN, NOT NEW YORK CITY — we say leave ‘em there so we always know where they are. Like this gem:

Gothamist: Easily the most livid neighbor of Union Hall to speak was Roberta Lehrner, who painted a picture of her block coming full circle from the “prostitutes and gypsies” she helped clean off the street to current female patrons of the bar that she could hear outside her window yelling, “F-me! F-me!”

Friends, there is only one reason to be upset by overhearing this mating call of the twentysomething: you’re probably not gettin’ any. And as far as Gypsies go:

Cher - Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves

Save Union Hall! Save Dick Swizzle’s Game Shows!!

Flickr photo by billyhc

Comments

Comment from ConflictOfInterests
Time May 10, 2008 at 11:38 am

Boycott hypocrite-activist Lou Souns and his Brazen Head bar:

“Community board members will violate Chapter 68 if they simultaneously have an interest in a licensed liquor facility and chair a community board committee responsible for considering liquor license applications. Community board members will not violate Chapter 68 if they have an interest in a licensed liquor facility and vote on matters involving liquor license applications of others, but, consistent with Charter Section 2604(b)(1)(b), they may not vote on their own license applications or those of persons with whom they are associated.”

Comment from ConflictOfInterests
Time May 14, 2008 at 1:11 pm

http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/05/community_board_3.php

Write a comment